Is the Sony A7iii for Me?

Sony A7iii.jpg

So I did indeed rent the Sony A7iii this past weekend. As you may recall from my last post, I wondered if a weekend with the A7iii might put my mind at ease about which camera to keep moving forward - my Nikon Z6 or the Sony A7iii.

Do I now have the sense of clarity I need? Read on.

When it came to renting the camera, I wound up getting the “one day” weekend rental from Looking Glass Photo in Berkeley. While it costs $150 a day for the camera body and the lens, Looking Glass, like many good photography shops, will let you pick up the camera on a Friday and return it on Monday for the one day price.

One thing which immediately surprised me, and made my comparison to the Z6 tough, is that the rental came with f/2.8 24-70mm G Master lens. This is a faster, higher quality lens that what the Sony A7iii kit might come with (f/3.5-5.6 27-70mm OSS lens). So for sure the better glass is going to return better photos.

How good is the lens? Well, consider this G master lens runs $2,198 - while the camera body itself runs $1,998.

One of the major factors that originally drew me away from the Sony A7iii were its ergonomics. The camera “felt” more like a gadget than a traditional camera. And the grip is just a tad smaller than the Z6, making it difficult to find a “home” for your pinky. One can make up for this by purchasing the Sony $350 vertical grip, but I could not rent one for the weekend, unfortunately.

But the worst design element I found was the front and rear control dials which, among other things, control changes to the aperture and shutter speed. Instead of the big, substantial dials you find on the Z6, the Sony’s are thin, “Ritz-cracker-edged” dials that are functional, but not as obvious and easy to maneuver.

What’s worse, there’s an exposure compensation dial to the right of the rear control dial which is larger and more substantial than the rear control dials. They should have designed the control dials like this. And of course, I did indeed mistakenly change the exposure compensation when meaning to use the rear control dial.

OK enough about the bad ergonomics. What about my overall impressions?

Well, I couldn’t run the most scientific tests with the camera, so I shot it around the house and took it along for some errands over the weekend.

Pros

  • Fun to use. Indeed, despite the ergonomics, I did find the camera easy, and dare I say, fun to use. The camera was fast, responsive, and fairly intuitive.

  • Menu & Set Up. You’ll read that Sony’s menus are tedious or confusing. But I found them fairly intuitive, easy to scroll through, and once I set it up with Fro’s recommendations, didn’t need to bother much with the menu again.

  • Controls. And once I started using the camera, despite the ergonomics and poor dial design, I found it easy to control everything from aperture, shutter, ISO, release modes etc.

  • f2.8 24-70 GM lens. Obviously this was a great lens to take sharp photos. Of course it would be a big investment to get a pro lens like this, but the Z6 equivalent is actually $100 more than the Sony, so one will get what they (are willing to) pay for.

  • Eye auto focus. The Sony definitely shines here. Like everyone says, “it just works” - and works so well. It found my daughters eyes fast and maintained focus even as they moved around. It’s really remarkable. The Z6 can do eye auto focus, but not as fast and not as consistently.

  • Continuous shooting 10 frames per second. The Sony is impressively fast. I ran several tests where I had my daughter walking toward me and the Sony maintained focus for a majority the 30+ continuous shots. it just fires them off at a rate that seems significantly faster than the Nikon.

  • Sharp images. And of course, most importantly, the Sony shot great images. Were they less vibrant than what comes out of the Nikon raw? Perhaps, but that’s easily adjusted in post production.

Here are some photos shot at home, Whole Foods, and during lunch on Saturday with the Sony A7iii on the f2.8 24-70 G Master lens…

So what about the downsides?

Cons

  • Ergonomics. I already spoke about the ergonomics above. I believe the vertical grip addition would improve the feel, - and the dual batteries is a nice plus. But compared to the Nikon, the camera will never feel or look as good.

  • Dials. Again, the front and rear control dials and exposure control should be so much better. Get rid of the exposure control dial and make those control dials more substantial.

  • Input seals. I found the side input seals to feel cheap and flimsy compared to the Nikon. It’s a shame because if Sony could improve its overall ergonomics and get them right, I bet many Nikon users could be swayed over. And this is not an A7iii issue - the A7r and A9 are essentially the same body design. Don’t worry about saving on cost or being compact - just get the design right.

  • EVF & LCD. The electronic view finder and LCD screen are indeed not as nice as the Nikon, but I didn’t find that to be a deal breaker in and of itself. It would be nice if the LCD on the Sony was a touchscreen, but I didn’t find that to be a problem during the weekend. I think over time I am going to appreciate the touchscreen LCD of the Z6 even more.

What about video? Well, I found out the hard way that my existing SD card was not the right type for supporting 4K video (the Nikon uses the more obscure, but faster, sturdy, and more expensive XQD cards.)

I did shoot a short 1080p video on the Sony and I trust it can get the job done. I do like to shoot video quite a bit and I know the Nikon has excellent video capability - perhaps better than the Sony. So the video is not a deal breaker either way as both do quite well.

Decision

So….what am i going to do? Well, one thing I did do was go back and forth with the Sony and my Nikon to compare the auto focus capability and other functionality and feel. And while for sure the Sony is faster and more precise in its auto focus, the Nikon did OK on the whole to try to keep up.

I went back to re-read up some of the initial reviews on the Nikon Z6 (Jared Polin, Ditch Auto, Ditch Auto 2, Ken Rockwell) and then did some additional research on how to set up and use the camera (Ken Rockwell, Michael the Maven).

And by the end of the weekend, I am definitely leaning more towards keeping my Z6 and learning how to use it even better. There’s more to be learned about using it properly, more potential with better glass, and on the whole, more potential with my just learning to be a better photographer.

Was it worth renting the camera for the weekend? Absolutely! I do still have till the end of the month to make a final decision…

Cognitive Dissonance - Did I Make Z Right Choice?

Nikon+Z6.jpg

It’s been a little over a month since I purchased my Nikon Z6 mirrorless camera, and as I mentioned in my inaugural post, I have been having issues with the continual focus. Come to think of it, I have issues with continual focus in the real world too!

Wait…what was I talking about?…

Continual focus – or more specifically “eye auto focus” (EAF) – is a relatively new auto-focus technology that ideally finds the subject’s eye(s) and locks in focus even as the subject is moving around. This is important when trying to capture moving subjects like say, my daughter at her dance recital – or my other daughter moving around the stage during her school play. Or, in the “real world” for a photo journalist who is trying to capture spontaneous moments where you can’t predict where your subject is going next.

EAF is one of the key differentiators of the Sony system – they created and perfected the technology – and everyone else, including Nikon is trying to catch up. You can see a comparison of the EAF in the tests run on the Sony A7iii versus the Nikon Z6 versus the Canon EOS R in this video by Jared Polin (“Fro Knows Photo”) below.

As Jared states, when it comes to EAF:

“Nikon is a newborn, or still in the womb, because they’re still trying to figure it all out, while the Sony is in college and is getting ready to graduate from college because it keeps getting better and better. Maybe it’s going for its Masters degree before it goes for its Doctorate. The Sony is by far better. The Nikon…it’s there. It’s starting to be useable.”

Beyond the EAF, the Sony A7iii also has two card slots (Z6 has one), an option to add a vertical grip (which makes the camera more ergonomically pleasing and allows you to have two batteries), and it allows for third party lenses from Sigma and Tamron which could be about half the price of native glass. All these Sony advantages come at about the same price I paid for the Nikon Z6.

So, I should just return my Nikon Z6 and go out and buy the Sony, right? (Yes, I do have the option to return the Z6 for a full refund). Well that’s where the cognitive dissonance sets in (link to song?). The reason I chose the Nikon to begin with is that it has a nicer electronic view finder (EVF) and LCD with a touchscreen. The colors coming out of the Nikon are more vibrant which suits my tastes. And the video capability of the Nikon might be better if I ever decide to get professionally serious about videography. It was a tough choice back in December and I sort of went with the “feel test” to make my decision at the time.

Earlier this week, I conducted an informal poll on the FroKnowPhoto Facebook group to ask their opinion and 60% said stick with the Z6, 10% said make the switch, and 10% said they don’t give a damn what I do (someone added that option in and people went for it.) Most recommended I get “better glass” which means buy more expensive/better lenses. The Z6 came with a 24-70 “kit lens” – the more expensive 24-70 f2.8 lens is about $2,200. (No, that’s not a misprint.)

Still undecided, I went to Samy’s Camera last night to get another feel of the Sony A7iii and to ask their experts what they think. Of course, they couldn’t provide a definitive recommendation. But they did say I could rent the Sony A7iii for the weekend if I want. So that’s something I’ll consider.

In the end, I just want one camera to have everything I want and need – and at the right price. And that probably doesn’t exist for a camera – or pretty much anything in life.

What do you think? What would you do?

20/20 Photography Vision

It’s been seven hours and fifteen days…plus another eleven years since I last wrote a photography blog. And it’s been sixteen years between the time I bought my very first Canon Digital Rebel to my recent Cyber Monday purchase of a new Nikon Z6 mirrorless camera.

I wouldn’t call it a new year’s resolution per se, but I rediscovered my passion for photography last August on an amazing trip to Venice. Walking 20,000+ steps a day around the lagoon city with only my iPhone 8 Plus in hand made traveling light, but the quality and creativity are just not quite there with a camera phone. Don’t get me wrong, you can take some amazing photos and videos with an iPhone, but as a recent photographer blogger said, “an iPhone is not a camera.”

The colorful island of Burano in Venice. Shot with an iPhone 8 Plus in August 2019. So…is an iPhone a camera?

So after returning from Venice, I vowed to purchase my first new camera since 2003. My fellow Salesforce shutterbug Antonio had the great idea to set Black Friday as my goal to finally pull the trigger. After watching scores of YouTube reviews and holding the likes of the Sony A7 III and Nikon Z6 in my hands, I took a leap of faith and clicked to purchase from Adorama on Cyber Monday.

Did I make the right call? It’s been a little over a month and I’ve had limited time to get to know - and use - the camera to make a full fledged verdict. I’m definitely struggling to learn all the options for focusing. And my new best friend, Jared Polin, a.k.a. “The Fro” will tell you that Sony is the right decision over Nikon. But when I had both cameras in my hand, the ergonomics of the Nikon were so much better that I had a hard time imagining having fun holding and using the Sony. I’ll have more to say about this decision in another future blog post.

One of my best first shots using the Nikon Z6 at a Shawl Anderson dance performance in December 2019.

Did I say more blog posts? Yes! In addition to writing about photography, I’m also in the (somewhat painful) process of building a photography Website! I’ve decided to go with Squarespace based on it’s apparent ease and flexibility to build a site to suit your heart’s content. But I have not been content. I can’t quite get its gallery and navigation to work the way I want. But the customer service at Squarespace has been really impressive as they’ve been trying to help me along the way. So stay tuned for the launch of the site.

In the meantime, I plan to continue to fuel that photography passion which was reignited in Venice to make 2020 all about taking my photography to the next level. And I’m hoping you’ll accompany me on this journey along the way.